During the Q&A following a lecture by film critic Pauline Kael which I attended years and years ago, I asked Ms. Kael what she thought about the trend that had taken hold at that time of filmmakers re-editing their released films. She replied with a question-approving look on her face that she hadn’t decided.
I read an article the other day about Francis Ford Coppola’s second re-editing of ‘Apocalypse Now’ called ‘Apocalypse Now: Final Cut’, due out next week. In a promotional lecture/interview mentioned in the piece, he says:
“In film-making and in life, extraordinary things happen to you, and it’s up to you to make them be positive. Because the good news is that there is no hell, and the quasi-good news is that this is heaven.”
I recently ran across a favorite greeting card, with this wonderful illustration on the outside. Inside, it says: ‘Listen to your instincts.’
I have never been able to make the picture and the sentiment match. I think Coppola’s might work better.
Minus the ‘heaven’ part…
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 11, 2019 at 3:16 pm
larrymuffin
Films should not be re-edited, they are presented once to the public and that is it. I am also against re-makes etc… I think only in America they do that, can’t recall other countries re-making or re-editing films.
August 11, 2019 at 3:42 pm
Dave
Example that always comes to (my) mind: ‘Amadeus’, very tidy. ‘Amadeus: Director’s Cut’, painful.
August 11, 2019 at 9:16 pm
Willym
You sent me searching for a Pauline Kael remark about Greer Garson – an actress she detested. I believe it was of her performance in Pride and Prejudice that she said: a viewer could get tired watching that eyebrow that goes up like the gold curtain at the old Met.
They don’t write reviews like that anymore!
August 18, 2019 at 10:11 pm
Urspo
I can empathize; I want to re-edit things from years ago. I’ve learned to let go.
September 7, 2019 at 7:52 pm
Urspo
Please sir I want some more.